Two storage engines compared

Two storage engines on six measures, each a closed polygon with a marker on every value: a solid line and a dashed one, so that color is not the only cue. Four grid rings carry their values along the first axis, and the description names the strongest and the weakest measure of each engine. Illustrative scores, with a phone variant.

Two storage engines compared

examples/framework-profile.json

{
  "schemaVersion": 1,
  "type": "radar",
  "title": "Two storage engines compared",
  "source": "Illustrative benchmark scores, 0 to 100",
  "width": 680,
  "height": 480,
  "radar": {
    "axes": [
      {
        "label": "Read",
        "max": 100
      },
      {
        "label": "Write",
        "max": 100
      },
      {
        "label": "Durability",
        "max": 100
      },
      {
        "label": "Memory",
        "max": 100
      },
      {
        "label": "Tooling",
        "max": 100
      },
      {
        "label": "Ease of use",
        "max": 100
      }
    ],
    "series": [
      {
        "name": "Engine A",
        "values": [
          92,
          58,
          74,
          40,
          85,
          66
        ]
      },
      {
        "name": "Engine B",
        "values": [
          64,
          88,
          90,
          72,
          55,
          48
        ]
      }
    ]
  },
  "mobile": {
    "width": 380,
    "height": 460
  }
}

Source: Illustrative benchmark scores, 0 to 100

Show chart data

Data for Two storage engines compared
Axis	Range	Engine A	Engine B
Read	0–100	92	64
Write	0–100	58	88
Durability	0–100	74	90
Memory	0–100	40	72
Tooling	0–100	85	55
Ease of use	0–100	66	48

Radar chart
Compare profiles on several measures